Congress Govt Formed: Complaint To ACB On KCR The Very 1st Day
Former CM KCR got a shock on the day the Congress government came to power in the state. Telangana High Court lawyer Rapolu Bhaskar has complained to the ACB that a comprehensive investigation should be conducted into the corruption in the Kaleshwaram lift scheme. Prominent lawyer Rapolu Bhaskar has complained to the Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB) about the corruption in this project. Rapolu has complained that thousands of crores have been stolen in the name of the Kaleshwaram project through fake estimations and high quotations. They also asked to register a case against Engineer-in-Chief Venkateshwarlu.
Also Read: Revanth Reddy’s First Speech As Telangana Chief Minister
Compliant on KCR
He mentioned that the decision to provide drinking water and irrigation water to the joint Adilabad, Nizamabad, Karimnagar, Medak, Warangal, Nalgonda and Rangareddy districts of the Telangana region was made in the joint Andhra Pradesh. He alleged that the government had contracted 228 packages under 7 links for the entire project works. Still, when the Telangana state was formed, KCR was elected as Chief Minister, and Harish Rao, KTR and Kavitha were elected as MPs. They all changed the project alignments and designs and increased the scope and expectations of the Kaleshwaram project. He requested for a case to be registered and a comprehensive investigation to be ordered into the plan to loot thousands of crores of public money in the name of the construction of the Kaleshwaram project.
Also Read: Allocation Of Departments To New Ministers: Cabinet Meeting Today
Negotiable Compliant
Lawyer Rapolu Bhaskar requested to register a complaint and carry out an enquiry saying that the former CM KCR and contractor Megha Krishna Reddy committed financial irregularities in the name of drinking and irrigation water projects. While it has become an interesting point to ponder about what action the ACB would take regarding this, on the other hand, it has become a matter of great debate whether this complaint was made with the government’s knowledge or in a personal capacity.
